Transportation

trans·por·ta·tion

noun \ˌtran(t)s-pər-ˈtā-shən\

: the act or process of moving people or things from one place to another

: a way of traveling from one place to another place

: a system for moving passengers or goods from one place to another

 

The Arizona Department of Transportation in partnership with local county departments of transportation has created a transportation infrastructure of complex roadways which not only move people but goods and services as well. They are trying to establish a long term plan to accommodate the tremendous population growth of the state. A well-planned transportation infrastructure is essential to accommodating this growth at the state, regional, and local levels (azdot.gov).  This transportation system is personal to each of us. It is how we get to work, to school, and to play (azdot.gov). It is important that it be developed with the highest levels of reliability and safety. The economic health and preservation and protection of natural resources, vegetation, and wildlife rely on the development of a transportation system that fulfills the immediate needs of residents while minimizing long term consequences to the environment. It is of utmost importance to implement plans to sustain the land for future generations.

 

According to the Department of Transportation, the current Arizona transportation infrastructure includes:

 

·         60,439 miles of public roadways

 

·         79 public-use airports

 

·         7835 bridges

 

·         1683 miles freight railroads

Courtesy of Google Maps
Courtesy of Google Maps

 

In this modern day and age we have developed many efficient means for transportation by way of land, sea, and sky, but the most important to us all is how we transport ourselves. Our means of personal transportation have become more than just vehicles to us anymore. They are now outward expressions of self, taste, and style as well as symbols of status and wealth. But we now have to ask ourselves, at what cost?

 

In the last decade we have become increasingly more aware of the state of our environment, pollution, over crowding, and the need to be more environmentally responsible. This awareness and responsibility comes only after assessing the damage we have created for ourselves with the purchase of a vehicle for every teenager’s 16th birthday and have become two and three car households. Vehicle sales in the U.S. hit a 5-year peak in 2012, an alarming statistic when you consider all of these damages and their residual effects. Some of these damages and effects are  more obvious than others, such as current pollution conditions, but other concerns such as current congestion conditions are less obvious to our everyday life even though they have just as much of an impact. What are those congestion concerns you ask? If this growth of vehicle sales continues at its current rate, by the year 2050 the ride from Phoenix to Tucson is estimated to take up to 5 hours (this estimate also takes into account future freeway expansion plans) (Arizona PIRG: Standing up to Powerful Interests) .

 

The impacts of transportation on a whole are somewhat paradoxical yielding both benefit and detriment (Rodrigue, 1998-2013). On a more global level, the evolution of transportation has allowed for a distribution of wealth, a sharing of necessary goods, and carrying people from one location to another. The socio-economic value of transportation is nearly immeasurable when you consider all of the good that all forms of transportation have provided this world. But here is where the paradox comes in and we see the damage of this gift as well, on a more local level we see noise and emissions problems, and on a larger scale we see global climate changes.

 

 

In 2009 the United States Census Bureau reported that there were 2.7 million employed persons in the state of Arizona. The data reports that 2 million or 75.9% of those workers commute to work alone each day. Only 11.8% of workers carpooled to work on a daily basis. These statistics have contributed to a ranking of 56th in the world and 19th in the nation for most congested cities as reported by the TomTom Traffic Index in 2013. Texas A&M Transportation Institute published the 2012 Urban Mobility Report which reports that population and employment growth is expected to increase congestion. Congestion is costing people time and money and the environment is being heavily impacted. Based on an average of 498 urban areas:

 

The average expense to commuters was a total of $121 billion dollars with an average of $818 per year per commuter.

  • 5.5 billion hours of time
  • 2.9 billion gallons of extra fuel
  • 56 BILLION pounds of ADDITIONAL CO2, greenhouse gas released.
  • 37% delay in the delivery in goods and services delaying the production and manufacturing efficiency for multiple industries.
TTI 2012 Urban Motility Report
TTI 2012 Urban Motility Report.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Document 3.7 MB

How backed up are we in Phoenix?

Courtesy of Phoenix New Times
Courtesy of Phoenix New Times

Congestion Solutions

Texas A&M Transportation Institute reports some viable solutions to reduce congestion:

 

  • Utilize resources to their maximum capability
  • Synchronize street lights
  • Expedite collision removal from roadways
  • Add capacity to main corridors
    • Increase number of lanes
    • More trains
    • More buses
  • Change usage patterns
    • Alternative work schedules to avoid peak drive time
    • Telecommuting
  • Provide choices
    • Multiple routes to same location
    • High speed toll roads
  • Diversify
    • Blend zoning for industrial, commercial, and residential reducing bottle necking getting into one are for one purpose.
  • Realistic Expectations
    • Congestion is inevitable but with the implementation and utilization of available resources congestion does not have to become an all day event.

Current Transportation Conditions

Courtesy of azdeq.gov
Courtesy of azdeq.gov

In an effort to curb these damages caused by transportation daily, we are beginning to see changes being made to legislature as well as incentives being offered to promote the use of alternative means. The Federal government with the help of the Environmental Protection Agency implemented The Clean Air Act in 1970. Congress designed the Clean Air Act to reduce a number of air pollution problems and to reduce the risk of future threats of pollutants. The Act calls for local, state, and federal governments to work in partnership to clean the air. The EPA established a based national air quality standard in 1996 to protect people from common pollutants. Six of the most common air pollutants are:

 

Emissions testing is probably the most well known legislation in regards to transportation, which requires vehicles to submit to testing ensuring that the pollutants emitted by vehicles stays under a specific level. Though this particular law seems somewhat minor when considering the amount of damages done, it does keep vehicles that do emit excessive amounts of pollutant from being legally registered. If they can’t be legally driven, then they can’t contribute to the noise, air, and congestion issues that are plaguing us today.

 

On the other end of the spectrum, we are seeing so many incentives being offered encouraging participation in alternative means of transportation. Here in Arizona we see tax exemptions and credits being offered to those driving electric and alternative fuel vehicles. That is, as opposed to having to pay a licensing fee of 60% for conventional vehicles, we are seeing a tax that is considerably less on alternative fuel vehicles that will maintain a yearly 15% reduction to a minimum fee of five dollars. Though the alternative fuels offer plenty of incentive for commuters, we see electric vehicles taking the cake on both incentives and legislature. Those who install their own electric vehicle charging station in their own home are eligible for a $75 tax credit, and are guaranteed a specialized parking space thanks to laws prohibiting occupying specially designated parking spaces for these vehicles by any other potential non electric vehicle.

 

Accessibility & Mobility in Urban and Rural Areas

 

Transportation and the environment have an impact towards our way of thinking in terms of innovation both in a local and global context. Over recent years, residents have changed living conditions to urban more so than rural settings. One of the biggest factors that has to do with this lifestyle change is mobility. This is relative because the resident has a more convenient independence to move freely at any point in time. It is important to understand the differences between the two lifestyles. Urban living consists of more accessibility of resources such as shopping centers, malls, and cities. The rural setting is more open in nature and land. Those who live in an urban setting may have a more convenient access to these physiological resources than those who live in a rural setting. Those who live in a rural setting are set apart in a sense and their access to collecting these resources may not be as easy, but not to say that this is always the case.

 

Courtesy of Google Maps
Courtesy of Google Maps

 

Mobility and accessibility which tend to be associated with each other have led to the notion that transportation has influence over cognition as to what is more reasonable within the individual’s transportation means. Transportations in a local standpoint include bicyclists, motor vehicle operators, and other public transportation (light rail, buses). From a global standpoint, airports are a form of transportation that may contain opportunities to create other forms of route that can be more accessible for individuals that are a part of the lifestyle of mobility. According to David Keeling, author of Transportation Geography: Local Challenges, Global Contexts, “Although the majority of applied research tends not to stray far from the confines of its local context, analyses of links between local places and global spaces have become more frequent and more methodologically rigorous. For example, airports and airline networks have attracted much attention from transport geographers, in part because of the obvious connections beyond the local.” (Keeling, 2009).

 

Courtesy of Sky Harbor Airport PHX
Courtesy of Sky Harbor Airport PHX

 

The mobility and accessibility factors also differ from each other in terms of travel and location space. Accessibility has advantages for those who are involved in a mobile lifestyle because it has the benefit of saving individuals time. The element that geographers are looking into is the opportunity for new route advancements and to encourage entrepreneurial outlooks that would benefit the transportation system from a local perspective which is also relative to the global transportation. Developing new routes would also afford individuals that live in a rural setting as much freedom to access resources as individuals that live in an urban setting. The expansion of housing in the Phoenix area has quickly spread to rural areas with many miles traveled between urban and rural areas for work and to access resources. These “suburban type” communities in rural areas have increased the amount of traffic in local neighborhoods, on rural roads, and on major interstates and highways (U.S. Census Bureau). Currently, Valley Metro has limited rural routes and an increase of availability to these areas would greatly improve mobility, access to resources, and could reduce the amount of cars travelling from rural areas.

 

Transportation Programs

Courtesy of media.benninit.net/az
Courtesy of media.benninit.net/az

Arizona Department of Transportation (AZDOT) and the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) implemented the Trip Reduction Program in the 1980s as part of the state’s effort to reduce air pollution. The legislation focuses on educating and encouraging employers and schools to reduce the number of single occupant vehicles (SOV) and promotes ridesharing and usage of public transportation. Employees and students contribute to the 80 million commuter miles driven each week which is a significant contributor to air pollution. Employers will often offer incentives for participating in the program; such as optimal parking designated for carpoolers, monetary compensation, gift cards, and reduced rates for public transportation passes.

 

The Trip Reduction Programs (TRP) requires employers with a minimum of 50 employees to reduce SOV or miles traveled to work by 10% every year for five years or until a 60% rate of SOV is reached. An annual commuter survey is used to develop and implement various strategies to reduce SOV trips and miles traveled per year. The TRP has established a task force to approve, reject, and enforce each employers TRP approved annual plan. Failure to comply with the TRP guidelines and expectation can result in civil penalties of up to $300 per day. The TRP has partnered with Valley Metro Public Transportation Alternatives to provide commuting solutions.

 

Public Transportation

Courtesy of valleymetro.org
Courtesy of valleymetro.org

Valley Metro is a valley-wide transit system. They offer Trip Planner services to help you plan your trip around town or get you to Sky Harbor Airport to get out of town. Services provided by Valley Metro include:

 

·         Local, LINK, Express and RAPID commuter bus service

 

·         Light rail

 

·         Neighborhood circulators

 

·         Rural route

 

·         Dial-a-Ride

 

·         Vanpool service

 

·         Online carpool and vanpool matching system

 

·         Assistance to local businesses to help them meet the Maricopa County trip reduction goals through alternative modes of transportation (bus, light rail, carpool, vanpool, bike, telework, etc.)

  

Valley Metro promotes their transportation alternatives through community outreach to educate schools, residents and employers. Valley Metro provides transit presentations for community groups such as:

 

Community Outreach

 

·         Mobility training for senior citizens and persons with a disability

 

·         How to use the transit system for new residents and refugees

 

·         General presentations to any group who wants to learn more about the transit system

 

·         Transit information and assistance at community or special events

 

School Outreach Program

  

Valley Metro’s school outreach program is designed to help students learn more about the transit system. The program consists of free classroom presentations about the Valley Metro transit system and a free Group Field Trip pass for eligible groups using local bus and light rail services.

 

For more information about Valley Metro, please visit www.valleymetro.org

 

Courtesy of valleymetro.org
Courtesy of valleymetro.org
Valley Metro System Map
Valley Metro System Map.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Document 4.2 MB

Impact of Alternative Programs

TRP 2012 Annual Report
TRP 2012 Annual Report

     Valley Metro and the Regional Public Transportation Authority report that their partnership with the Trip Reduction Program has established programs at 2,842 employee sites and 123 student sites. They report that there were 693,000 commuters participating in the program. Thirty-three percent of participants used alternate forms of transportation for their commuting miles. This has had a positive impact on the amount of emissions affecting air quality. According to the TRP’s 2013 fiscal year report, all sites combined saved a total of 101,685 pounds of pollution per day and approximately 18,430 TONS of pollution for the year. 

 

Courtesy of valleymetro.org
Courtesy of valleymetro.org

Along with boats, trains, planes, buses and trucks, America produces an excess of several billion tons of pollution each year most of which is caused by caused by vehicle emissions (Baxter, 2011). Though this rate of pollution sounds alarming, there are a number of alternatives to counter act this damage. How can we do this you ask? First we can start by using more alternative fuels, putting them as well as more electric vehicles on the road. Even though this seemed somewhat impossible only a few years ago, we are seeing an increase of these vehicles on the road as the technology is becoming more affordable, a trend we should continue in years to come. Public transportation and carpooling are the next obvious solution to this problem. Here in Arizona we are lucky to have Valley Metro services that provide not only bus routes but also metro light rail and rural services beginning at 4:40 am until 11:00 pm 365 days a year. In addition Valley Metro offers a multitude of park and ride centers that allow commuters to park in a location closer to their home in order to more effectively utilize the public transportation provided.

 

Courtesy of phoenix.gov
Courtesy of phoenix.gov

The City of Phoenix is committed to connecting Phoenix communities to existing city-health related programs and alternative transportation programs. The city has introduced a program called FitPHX which encourages activities to promote wellness. Part of the FitPHX program includes walking, biking and utilizing public transportation.  The program coordinators are hoping that this program will become a great resource for residents to live a healthy lifestyle. For more information about this program visit the FitPHX website.

 

Courtesy of phoenix.gov
Courtesy of phoenix.gov

FitPHX recognizes that the city is in need of more parks, playgrounds, community walkability, and bike lanes. AARP reports that the The Phoenix City Council will be voting this month (December 2013) on a “complete streets” initiative. This initiative would encourage residents to walk, bike, and use public transit implementing measures to keep all users safe. The new road construction would feature amenities such as:

 

·         Bike lanes

 

·         Benches for bus riders

 

·         Street lamps

 

·         Curb cuts for wheelchairs/strollers

 

The City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department proposed the initiative and would like to hear your comments. Please visit www.phoenix.gov/streets to read the plan.

 

Complete Streets Plan:

 

Phoenix Complete Streets Draft Policy

 

Complete Streets Survey:

 

Complete Streets Survey

 

 

Commuters across the Valley celebrated Rideshare Month in October by using alternate modes of transportation by riding the transit, car or vanpooling, working from home, or biking or walking. Valley Metro has a Rideshare Month Employer Challenge which took place October 6-12. The participating TRP companies competed against other TRP companies and encouraged their employees to get involved. The winning companies win prizes and a special plaque, which proclaims them the Employer Challenge Champion.  During the entire month of October, anyone that tracks their commute and uses alternative modes will earn points which allow them to enter and win great prizes. For more information and to bookmark it for next year visit www.ShareTheRide.com. This is a great way to save money and reduce traffic congestion. This also contributes to a reduction of the estimated 770 tons of carbon monoxide and 3,000 tons of particulates which contribute to Valley air pollution EACH DAY.

 

Plans for the future

Courtesy of arizonainformation.info
Courtesy of arizonainformation.info

The future of transportation in Arizona lies in a 5 year plan designed by the ADOT board. This five year span from 2014 through 2018 is aiming to preserve the existing highway systems while expanding them further to other less developed areas in both Maricopa and Pima County (ADOT, 2013). This plan will include the expansion of the I10, US 60 and SR 89 as well as expansions connecting SR260 with the I17 amongst other areas  (ADOT, 2013) . These expansions will allow for further development of these less traveled areas, hopefully lessening the congestion in other areas of the Phoenix Metro Area. In a more long term goal, ADOT has prepared a transportation plan for 2035 that is aimed at finding a strategic plan and direction for transportation in Arizona  (ADOT, 2013). Not only does this project aim at working out travel and financial goals for the state, but is also preparing to better comply with clean air policies and create and anticipate the need for a more multimodal transportation system (ADOT, 2013). Change is the only constant in this world, which means transportation must keep up with our evolution as well. Through this plan we are seeing Arizona’s attempt at evolving with the needs of the population and the environment.

For more about his plan for 2035 click on the following link:

http://www.azdot.gov/docs/default-source/planning/lrtp-2011-1129.pdf?sfvrsn=2

 

Courtesy of azmag.gov
Courtesy of azmag.gov

Our Team

We hope that this site about Transportation is just as informative for you as it has been for us.

 

Thank you and Enjoy,

Nicole Valenzuela-Team Lead, Researcher, and writer

Desiree Coyne-Researcher and writer

Andreas Parra-Researcher and writer

References

Works Cited:

Arizona Indicators. 2013. Arizona Directions 2013:Fostering Data-Driven Dialogue in Public Policy. Arizona State University Morrison Institue for Public Policy. Accessed http://arizonaindicators.org/sites/default/files/content/publications/

ArizonaDirections2013.pdf. 23 November 2013.

 

Arizona PIRG: Standing up to Powerful Interests. (n.d.). (Arizona Public Interest Research Group) Retrieved 11 21, 2013, from Arizona PIRG: Standing up to Powerful Interests: arizonapirg.org

Baxter, E. (2011, April 25). HowStuffWorks.com. Retrieved December 4, 2013, from science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/10-transportation-pollution-solutions.htm#page=0

 

Keeling, D. J. (2009). Transportation geography: Local challenges, global contexts. Progress in     Human Geography, 33(4), 516-526. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/docview/230697968

Rodrigue, D. J.-P. (1998-2013). The Geography of Transport Systems. (D. J.-P. Rodrigue, Producer, & Department of Global Studies and Geography, Hofstra University) Retrieved 11 26, 2013, from people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch8en/conc8en/ch8c1en.html

Websites:

2012 US Mobility Report

http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/national-congestion-tables/ 23 November 2013

City and County

http://www.phoenix.gov/

http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/about.htm 23 November 2013

http://phoenix.gov/streets/aboutus/index.html 23 November 2013

Transportation Improvement Program

http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/technical/tip/tip.htm 23 November 2013

http://www.maricopa.gov/aq/divisions/trip_reduction/

Default.aspx 23 November 2013

Clean air

www.azeq.gov

Valley Metro

http://www.valleymetro.org/overview 23 November 2013

http://www.valleymetro.org/campaigns_contests/rideshare_month 23 November 2013

Population Facts

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/04000.html

ADOT Photos

http://www.azdot.gov/media/adot-graphic-standards

Phoenix New Times:

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2013/11

/phoenix_traffic_best_los_angeles_worst.php

Participations reference:

http://www.maricopa.gov/aq/divisions/trip_reduction/docs/pdf/

2013AnnualReport.pdf

TomTom Report link :

http://www.tomtom.com/lib/doc/trafficindex/2013-1101%20TomTomTrafficIndex2013Q2AME-mi.pdf

Welcome!

This site is an ongoing project of Dr. Perla A. Vargas and her students in Environmental Psychology at New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University, AY 2013-2014.

 

© 2013-2014 Please give credit to authors when citing. The viewpoints expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of ASU.

ASU logo